<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mysterious Mr. Keynes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=1727#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Keynes, like Marx, should certainly be studied. Not as theory, but rather as important figures in economic history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keynes, like Marx, should certainly be studied. Not as theory, but rather as important figures in economic history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoff tily</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/comment-page-1/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>geoff tily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=1727#comment-638</guid>
		<description>Worstall&#039;s contribution is not helpful, as the responses on his own blog indicate. Surely Ann is suggesting that what is taught as Keynes 

(Keynesianism) bears very little resemblance to Keynes&#039;s actual theories and writings. And that this is true even in Cambridge. Who could 

disagree?

Certainly the writings of Dasgupta, Dornbusch and Mankiw may offer a useful guide to &#039;Keynesianism&#039;, but they offer no guide to 

Keynes. Mankiw has even issued a disclaimer:  ‘If New Keynesian economics is not a true representation of Keynes’s views, then so much the worse 

for Keynes’ (‘The Reincarnation of Keynesian Economics’, European
Economic Review, 36 (2–3), April 1992, p. 560).

Yet it is to Keynes not 

Mankiw that policymakers are now turning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worstall&#8217;s contribution is not helpful, as the responses on his own blog indicate. Surely Ann is suggesting that what is taught as Keynes </p>
<p>(Keynesianism) bears very little resemblance to Keynes&#8217;s actual theories and writings. And that this is true even in Cambridge. Who could </p>
<p>disagree?</p>
<p>Certainly the writings of Dasgupta, Dornbusch and Mankiw may offer a useful guide to &#8216;Keynesianism&#8217;, but they offer no guide to </p>
<p>Keynes. Mankiw has even issued a disclaimer:  ‘If New Keynesian economics is not a true representation of Keynes’s views, then so much the worse </p>
<p>for Keynes’ (‘The Reincarnation of Keynesian Economics’, European<br />
Economic Review, 36 (2–3), April 1992, p. 560).</p>
<p>Yet it is to Keynes not </p>
<p>Mankiw that policymakers are now turning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Stephenson</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Stephenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=1727#comment-636</guid>
		<description>You are joking surely? How can you study economics and not look at Keynes?  

Maybe we should 

get his books and burn them just to be sure that his crazy ideas are never read again?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are joking surely? How can you study economics and not look at Keynes?  </p>
<p>Maybe we should </p>
<p>get his books and burn them just to be sure that his crazy ideas are never read again?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byrus Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Byrus Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=1727#comment-633</guid>
		<description>That is the best news I have heard in a long time.  Viva von Mises!  Viva Hayek!

-From the ravings of the Psychomancer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the best news I have heard in a long time.  Viva von Mises!  Viva Hayek!</p>
<p>-From the ravings of the Psychomancer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My del.icio.us bookmarks for February 16th &#124; called2account</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>My del.icio.us bookmarks for February 16th &#124; called2account</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=1727#comment-632</guid>
		<description>[...] Debtonation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Mysterious Mr. Keynes - 

Keynes is no longer taught at Cambridge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debtonation &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Mysterious Mr. Keynes &#8211; </p>
<p>Keynes is no longer taught at Cambridge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keynes no longer taught at Cambridge?</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Keynes no longer taught at Cambridge?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=1727#comment-631</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Ritchie I see that this is the claim, that JM Keynes 

is no longer taught at Cambridge University. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Ritchie I see that this is the claim, that JM Keynes </p>
<p>is no longer taught at Cambridge University. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / My del.icio.us bookmarks for February 16th</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / My del.icio.us bookmarks for February 16th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=1727#comment-629</guid>
		<description>[...] Debtonation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Mysterious Mr. Keynes - Keynes is no longer taught at Cambridge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debtonation &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Mysterious Mr. Keynes &#8211; Keynes is no longer taught at Cambridge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Caruana</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/comment-page-1/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Caruana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=1727#comment-626</guid>
		<description>Shocking for me.

In my country all that happens happens mainly through government 

intervention in any way imaginable.

Therefore Keynesian economics is one of the core types of economics which we are presented with as 

introduction to the subject.
But now that I dwell furthur into it. The support of keynesian system of economics is falling and I wonder whether 

the current crisis will get my teachers to rethink their monetarist/noninterventionist lecturing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shocking for me.</p>
<p>In my country all that happens happens mainly through government </p>
<p>intervention in any way imaginable.</p>
<p>Therefore Keynesian economics is one of the core types of economics which we are presented with as </p>
<p>introduction to the subject.<br />
But now that I dwell furthur into it. The support of keynesian system of economics is falling and I wonder whether </p>
<p>the current crisis will get my teachers to rethink their monetarist/noninterventionist lecturing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabine K McNeill</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/02/the-mysterious-mr-keynes/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabine K McNeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=1727#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Just as the student at the LSE who was told she couldn&#039;t write her PhD on the money supply, Ann. 



The reason? &quot;That&#039;s not capitalism!&quot;

In other words, that&#039;s the difference between myths and mystification of economists v de-

mystfication of self-taught thinkers!

Sighingly yours,
Sabine
Organiser, Forum for Stable Currencies
http://tinyurl.com/666rwd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as the student at the LSE who was told she couldn&#8217;t write her PhD on the money supply, Ann. </p>
<p>The reason? &#8220;That&#8217;s not capitalism!&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, that&#8217;s the difference between myths and mystification of economists v de-</p>
<p>mystfication of self-taught thinkers!</p>
<p>Sighingly yours,<br />
Sabine<br />
Organiser, Forum for Stable Currencies<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/666rwd" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/tinyurl.com/666rwd?referer=');">http://tinyurl.com/666rwd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

