<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Challenging the dogma of ‘yesterday’s men’.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debtonation.org/2009/04/challenging-the-dogma-of-%e2%80%98yesterday%e2%80%99s-men%e2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/04/challenging-the-dogma-of-%e2%80%98yesterday%e2%80%99s-men%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ann</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/04/challenging-the-dogma-of-%e2%80%98yesterday%e2%80%99s-men%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=2180#comment-954</guid>
		<description>Larry, sorry for this...will refer it to the techies....its a bit clunky wordpress..and we would welcome a little more 

expertise on its workings...

And thank you for those names! I do not know them all is the honest answer to your question; but very grateful 

to be referred to them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, sorry for this&#8230;will refer it to the techies&#8230;.its a bit clunky wordpress..and we would welcome a little more </p>
<p>expertise on its workings&#8230;</p>
<p>And thank you for those names! I do not know them all is the honest answer to your question; but very grateful </p>
<p>to be referred to them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr L Brownstein</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/04/challenging-the-dogma-of-%e2%80%98yesterday%e2%80%99s-men%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr L Brownstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=2180#comment-915</guid>
		<description>I wish I could have been able to preview my previous submission and been able to see how it would look. Your techies ought to be able 

to implement this feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could have been able to preview my previous submission and been able to see how it would look. Your techies ought to be able </p>
<p>to implement this feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr L Brownstein</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/04/challenging-the-dogma-of-%e2%80%98yesterday%e2%80%99s-men%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr L Brownstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=2180#comment-914</guid>
		<description>Ann, I left out Peter Temin. He might be useful on policy testing. Mervyn King recently committed a logical error, the fallacy of 

affirming the consequent in an interview with Faisal Islam.  Here is the context:

Logic of Policy Testing:

H: Policy P will lead to 

desired results R – if P then R

Can falsify policy P by not observing R (or observing not-R)
  Implement policy P
  Do not observe R 

within a reasonable time    frame (not-R)
  Conclude not-P (I.e., P ineffective)
  [This is a valid inference ((if P then R) &amp; not-R, 

therefore not-P)]

Can NOT ‘verify’ policy P from simply observing R
  Implement policy P
  Observe R within a reasonable time frame


  Can’t conclude P is effective based on 2 – fallacious to do so
  [Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent – committed by Mervyn King in 3/2009  

(‘(if P then R) &amp; R, therefore P’ is a fallacious inference)]

Apologies for being a bit technical here but I saw no way around it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann, I left out Peter Temin. He might be useful on policy testing. Mervyn King recently committed a logical error, the fallacy of </p>
<p>affirming the consequent in an interview with Faisal Islam.  Here is the context:</p>
<p>Logic of Policy Testing:</p>
<p>H: Policy P will lead to </p>
<p>desired results R – if P then R</p>
<p>Can falsify policy P by not observing R (or observing not-R)<br />
  Implement policy P<br />
  Do not observe R </p>
<p>within a reasonable time    frame (not-R)<br />
  Conclude not-P (I.e., P ineffective)<br />
  [This is a valid inference ((if P then R) &amp; not-R, </p>
<p>therefore not-P)]</p>
<p>Can NOT ‘verify’ policy P from simply observing R<br />
  Implement policy P<br />
  Observe R within a reasonable time frame</p>
<p>  Can’t conclude P is effective based on 2 – fallacious to do so<br />
  [Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent – committed by Mervyn King in 3/2009  </p>
<p>(‘(if P then R) &amp; R, therefore P’ is a fallacious inference)]</p>
<p>Apologies for being a bit technical here but I saw no way around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr L Brownstein</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/04/challenging-the-dogma-of-%e2%80%98yesterday%e2%80%99s-men%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr L Brownstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=2180#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Ann, I don&#039;t quite agree with your list of suggested candidates for advice. There are features of Daly&#039;s outlook that I think are 

problematic, so I would not include him.  In addition to Brooksley Born, what about Meredith Whitney?  And what about Nassim Taleb and Thomas 

Homer-Dixon? Richard C. Koo?  Riccardo Rebonato? Ed Leamer? Donald Moggridge?  In addition to Victoria Chick, who is a wonderful choice, on the 

same basis I would include Axel Leijonhufvud and Donald Markwell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann, I don&#8217;t quite agree with your list of suggested candidates for advice. There are features of Daly&#8217;s outlook that I think are </p>
<p>problematic, so I would not include him.  In addition to Brooksley Born, what about Meredith Whitney?  And what about Nassim Taleb and Thomas </p>
<p>Homer-Dixon? Richard C. Koo?  Riccardo Rebonato? Ed Leamer? Donald Moggridge?  In addition to Victoria Chick, who is a wonderful choice, on the </p>
<p>same basis I would include Axel Leijonhufvud and Donald Markwell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

