30 June, 2009. This column and its readers have been sadly neglected to meet the demands of other peoples’ agendas. I can only apologise.
For it is other peoples’ agendas that preoccupies me today. There have been many important meetings held this year, in which groups of people have come together to collectively develop ‘grand narratives.’ on the theme of the financial crisis. These, it is hoped, will help galvanise an apparently mesmerised population into action against those in finance, politics and the world of academic economics – that have helped wreak ruin, bankruptcies, home repossessions, large-scale fraud and unemployment on society.
But most of these grand narratives are characterised by ignorance of the nature of bank money, and credit, and as a result both mis-diagnose the causes of the crisis, and mis-analyse solutions….
This is because most assume that credit = savings, and that only by mobilising savings or surpluses (generated by production of one sort or another) is it possible for banks or financial institutions to lend money to finance economic activity. In other words, that money (deposits/savings/credit) exists only as the result of economic activity; and those deposits/savings/credit then create economic activity.
On the contrary: it is bank money/credit that creates economic activity – and only then are deposits, surpluses and savings generated. And not the other way around.
Continue reading… ›