<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The G20 &#8211; rebooting the system.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debtonation.org/2009/10/the-g20-rebooting-the-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/10/the-g20-rebooting-the-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the.Duke.of.URL</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/10/the-g20-rebooting-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>the.Duke.of.URL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=2908#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>Darling&#039;s craven attitude to the banksters and their bonuses during the Labour conference was reminiscent of JFK trying to get 

industrialists to curb pricing. They agreed and then went back home and altered their behavior not a jot. 

The difference between Kennedy 

and Darling: Kennedy forced their hand. Kennedy&#039;s response: to publicly state that these men were no longer welcome at the White House which at 

the time was a big deal. This shamed them sufficiently that they did what they had agreed with Kennedy that they would do. What will Darling do if 

the banksters renege?

Hutton was interviewed and said that the banksters when they meet with Darling will agree and then go home and do what 

they have been doing. I see no reason to disbelieve Hutton on this. What &quot;incentive&quot; is there for the banksters to do other than what they have 

been doing? An appeal to their &quot;good nature&quot;, their commitment to the common weal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darling&#8217;s craven attitude to the banksters and their bonuses during the Labour conference was reminiscent of JFK trying to get </p>
<p>industrialists to curb pricing. They agreed and then went back home and altered their behavior not a jot. </p>
<p>The difference between Kennedy </p>
<p>and Darling: Kennedy forced their hand. Kennedy&#8217;s response: to publicly state that these men were no longer welcome at the White House which at </p>
<p>the time was a big deal. This shamed them sufficiently that they did what they had agreed with Kennedy that they would do. What will Darling do if </p>
<p>the banksters renege?</p>
<p>Hutton was interviewed and said that the banksters when they meet with Darling will agree and then go home and do what </p>
<p>they have been doing. I see no reason to disbelieve Hutton on this. What &#8220;incentive&#8221; is there for the banksters to do other than what they have </p>
<p>been doing? An appeal to their &#8220;good nature&#8221;, their commitment to the common weal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/10/the-g20-rebooting-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1315</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=2908#comment-1315</guid>
		<description>is anyone mildly intelligent suprised?

unless we adopt a different system, we perpetuate such results.



thezeitgeistmovement.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is anyone mildly intelligent suprised?</p>
<p>unless we adopt a different system, we perpetuate such results.</p>
<p>thezeitgeistmovement.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

