<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Treasury Privatised</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debtonation.org/2009/10/the-treasury-privatised/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/10/the-treasury-privatised/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken MacIntyre</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/10/the-treasury-privatised/comment-page-1/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken MacIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=3094#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>Why inflate the housing market? Because 60% of the UK&#039;s money supply depends upon mortgage loans and any contraction in mortgages 

shrinks the money supply. But this is a supremely daft way to run an economy. The Government should take full control of the money supply and issue 

money. That is what it is there for. It already issues notes and coins which once made up half the money supply, so there is no reason why it 

cannot issue electronic money directly into the economy, for example, by financing some of its own spending in this way. 

The CRESC report 

although very good in many ways misses this point and does not acknowledge private debt as the fundamental problem.

&#039;Faced by a failure of 

credit, they only propose the lending of more money&#039; (FDR 1933)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why inflate the housing market? Because 60% of the UK&#8217;s money supply depends upon mortgage loans and any contraction in mortgages </p>
<p>shrinks the money supply. But this is a supremely daft way to run an economy. The Government should take full control of the money supply and issue </p>
<p>money. That is what it is there for. It already issues notes and coins which once made up half the money supply, so there is no reason why it </p>
<p>cannot issue electronic money directly into the economy, for example, by financing some of its own spending in this way. </p>
<p>The CRESC report </p>
<p>although very good in many ways misses this point and does not acknowledge private debt as the fundamental problem.</p>
<p>&#8216;Faced by a failure of </p>
<p>credit, they only propose the lending of more money&#8217; (FDR 1933)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Welton</title>
		<link>http://www.debtonation.org/2009/10/the-treasury-privatised/comment-page-1/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Welton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debtonation.org/?p=3094#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>In Britain...

  “It is not clear whether the banks have been nationalised or the Treasury has been 

privatised as a new kind of investment fund.”

with our GoldmanSachsTreasuryFed... its clear here!

Kent Welton,


PublicCentralBank.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Britain&#8230;</p>
<p>  “It is not clear whether the banks have been nationalised or the Treasury has been </p>
<p>privatised as a new kind of investment fund.”</p>
<p>with our GoldmanSachsTreasuryFed&#8230; its clear here!</p>
<p>Kent Welton,</p>
<p>PublicCentralBank.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

