This is a piece written for a conference on Islamic finance to be held on 29th April in Edinburgh.



|
||
|
This is a piece written for a conference on Islamic finance to be held on 29th April in Edinburgh. The notion of the moral economy is intrinsic to all the major faiths, each of which has placed ethical boundaries on the behaviour of those active in the market.
The ten commandments of the Jewish Torah or Christian Old Testament laid down an ethical boundary – or regulation – for work:
“for six days you shall labour and do all your work. But the seventh day is a Sabbath to the Lord your God; you shall not do any work – you, your son or your daughter, your male or female slave, your livestock, or the alien resident in your towns.
The Qu’ran lays down clear ethical boundaries for lending and borrowing, and for trade.
These boundaries have been vital in the maintenance of great civilisations. As Karl Polanyi, the great economic historian argued (in his 1944 book “The Great Transformation”) – the regulation of the conduct of human affairs by law is vital to the maintenance of civilised society, and to the market, because
“robbed of the protective covering of cultural institutions, human beings would perish from the effects of social exposure; they would die as the victims of acute social dislocation through vice, perversion, crime and starvation….neighbourhoods and landscapes defiled, rivers polluted, military safety jeopardized, the power to produce food and raw materials destroyed”.
![]() ![]() So one of the great contradictions we in the West face today is this: law – or regulation – needs boundaries, in particular ethical boundaries; but also geographical and political boundaries.
However markets, in particular financial markets, abhor boundaries.
![]() How do we reconcile therefore, the ethical boundaries/regulation advocated by the world’s great religions with the resistance of, in particular financial markets, to these boundaries? Continue reading… ›
4th March 2010
English version> Icelandic version> Press release> Full text of the article: So the negotiations have broken down, British and Dutch “bullying” (FT 27 February, 2010) continues and the referendum goes ahead. What next? We emphasize that this is not a sovereign debt crisis, even if the British and Dutch want us to think it is. It is a crisis of EU regulatory failure, and of the Anglo-American economic model. The people of Iceland have a deep democratic tradition, and through the referendum have the opportunity to assert their sovereignty and autonomy. Their leadership and example will encourage people in other democracies to reject harsh cuts in public services and living standards made at the behest of the very people and institutions responsible for the crisis. For through the wholesale nationalisation of private losses, we are all – not only in Iceland – asked to pay the price of private, reckless risk-taking. Continue reading… › 5th February 2010 My conversation earlier this week with Elena Sisti – of Italy’s Altreconomia on macro-economics, reform of the finance sector, money, and yes, how we women have left the all-important matter of finance to the boys. Big mistake. It’s time to get in there, and exercise influence. Too much is at stake. Continue reading… ›
At the end of last month I delivered the prestigious EBOR lecture at York. My address was entitled: “Credit, usury and political power: chasing the moneylenders from the temple that is our democracy” Click on the link below to read a PDF version of the full lecture: |
||
|
Copyright © 2013 Debtonation: The Global Financial Crisis - All Rights Reserved |
||